Animate
Choose whether to animate, then implement timing, interruption, and reduced motion.
Review Animations
A strict review of timing, purpose, interruption, and animation implementation.
The editorial verdict
Where it earns its place.
The useful second pass after a motion implementation: it produces concrete findings and an explicit review decision. Its scope is deliberately limited to animation code and its standards favor restraint. A clean review is still a judgment against those rules, not a measured performance result.
Reach for it when
- Reviewing a motion diff
- A team that wants consistent animation feedback
Think twice if
- You need general UI or accessibility coverage
- You expect the reviewer to implement unrelated features
Before you install
Compatibility & contents.
- Claude Code
- partial
- Cursor
- partial
- Codex
- partial
- Gemini CLI
- partial
- GitHub Copilot
- partial
- License
- MIT
- Bundled scripts
- None found
- Hooks
- None found
Native: documented support. Partial: setup or adaptation may be needed. Not verified: the source has not established this fact. “None found” describes the inspected skill, not a security audit. Read the methodology.
Source context
The repository, in numbers.
Source: GitHub / emilkowalski/skills. Repository totals may be shared by several skills. Snapshot fetched ; these are not live counts. Check the snapshot date for freshness. Popularity is not a measure of design quality.
Watch the overlap.
No conflicts are recorded. This does not establish that every combination has been tested.